As a lawyer, my inclination to read and digest the contract of sale brought a number of questions to light that I wanted to clarify before proceeding with the deal.

I am inclined to this option as it would allow me to return home to assist my parents and save money while pursuing my law degree.- Does anyone think this is a sound idea?

If someone were so inclined they could go through your post history and find example upon example upon example of conflicting statements like this one.

I expect rents to go up a lot because less and less Americans can afford a house over time plus folks are far more mobile now so they may be inclined to rent vs buy.

With rents cooling off, some landlords are becoming more desperate to fill vacancies and may be more inclined to approve tenants who don’t quite meet all the usual criteria.

I'm inclined to say no, especially because my margins have gone down significantly with increased property tax and insurance, and I haven't raised rent.

For example, If the property is worth $95k and the UPB is $92k, I would be inclined to offer $76k (80% of market value) to give me enough cushion in case the note went bad and I had to foreclose. 

If you can get a handle on the cost to repair these issues and still think its a good deal, I would be inclined to move forward if I was the buyer.

My inclination is no, it ups my risk and I can find a group who would all be on the same lease, but maybe I should consider it as they seem like a good group.

It’s also the career tenants who live in inexpensive housing because it’s all they can afford who are far more inclined to take advantage of liberal landlord tenant laws and that's going to be a minority of the tenant base if you invest in gateway cities.