Now one bad apple makes the whole deal bad and everyone is looking to you to make them whole.That is really a bad situation to be in with the SEC or in court.

You're comparing apples to oranges because 30% is a pretty standard expense ratio for a park and 20% is unheard of for SFH.

PM is a different apple, but I know my capabilities and this won't be a problem.3.

This way you can compare apples to apples.The hard part comes with the backend.

Comparing apples to watermelons in several projections,imo.3.

Because of the proprietary power cord it uses, and the fact that Apple just changed it.

We could argue this all day, but assuming an apples to apples comparison, a finished lot deal should almost always net a greater IRR because your timing, as you mentioned, is much shorter even though you are most likely paying more money for a finished lot as opposed to a raw or engineered lot.

This article/example is an apples to oranges comparison in data sample usage ;)However, I do like your topic of choice.

Something to consider when doing an apples-to-apples comparison. 

I accept checks, money orders, credit card, bank draft, google pay, apple pay, even facebook pay.