But have faith.

Adverse Possession is considered favorable to public policy in all 50 states and commonwealths.This is why it is addressed statutorily in each jurisdiction.The difficulty some of the posters are having difficulty with is the application of statutes and are confusing the use of AP as a tool to resolve a transfer of ownership matter with a lazy squatter who is ignorant of laws and takes no legally supportive steps beyond possession to acquire title.Adverse Possession is accomplished in too ways: 1) Color of Title, whereby a possessor is relying in good faith upon transfer document(s) which, upon its face, appears to pass legal record title but, for reasons not apparent, fails to do so; and,2) Claim of Right, whereby the possessor has taken possession of the affected property in and open and notorious way, hostile manner (without permission of record owner), exclusively, fenced it, improved it, paid all prior and current taxes for the prescribed period, etc. 

My friend, you're putting in a LOT of faith into the government holding to their promises that your money will be free to withdraw tax free some 20-30-40 years into the future.The people who made those promises will be long dead and gone by then, and the new Congress will be doing everything they can to grab all that juicy money just sitting there slightly out of their reach.A Roth makes sense ONLY if you're in the lowest tax bracket already.

Take the leap of faith and I promise you can figure it out along the way.

A filing made in good faith in an improper place or not in all of the places required is nevertheless effective with regard to any collateral as to which the filing complied with the requirements and is also effective with regard to collateral covered by the financing statement against any person who has knowledge of the contents of the financing statement.

There is such a thing as the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and if you violate that, you are in breach of contract.That said, you can make your other offer expressly contingent on not getting your preferred property, but be prepared to show proof that your desired contract was accepted.Personally, I'd concentrate on the desired contract and not make other offers.

Faith-based lending is a tricky segment and not many lenders like to lend in that space.

My business partner's family has 80 acres of heir property that they have never visited (but faithfully pay them taxes every year). 

I have great faith in parties to act in their own financial interest before their fiduciary duties.

The courts would likely side with the tenant.Have faith.