Including data on local economic indicators and detailed guest demographics could help users better understand market potential. 

Primary reason is that it's not economical to building in today's market compared to a larger industrial building with only 1-2 tenants to manage instead of 30 smaller ones.

Hey @Connor Amato Both Buckeye & San Tan Valley are great up-and-coming cities/economic hubs.

C" tenants are not all bad people, economically they may not have a bunch of money but they are not all bad people.

It's just that those potential movements will be based on other considerations (chiefly, incoming economic reports) and NOT on the Fed's rate cut.To make matters more confusing, it's important to remember that Fed policy still has a tremendous impact on rates, but that impact stems from the Fed's words and quarterly projections.

I lean toward the latter—this is more about economic conditions and the lingering post-COVID effects.

Btw, prior, the city and state would NOT foreclose for property tax nor accept the building as a gift; the government just determined that these property owners must become economic “slaves” to the government.  

The City of Chicago has recently streamlined its financial incentive programs for economic development within city limits.

It's not a mind-boggling salary, but it's enough, and the economical decision would be to move into a LCOL area and thrive.

Also, i would say smaller funds can be economically more difficult with a high expense ratio under say 5-10M AUM (assets under management).