We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

Condos are often very bad investments for resale, but if the numbers extra good for cash flow because of that, you actually can benefit more than are harmed if you have a buy-and-hold strategy rather than sell-when-the-selling's-good strategy.

I'm no fan of wholesellers, but if they find out after close -- what's the harm? 

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

If the building has 4 units or less and the owner lives in one of the units.If the property is a SFH and the owner owns less than 3 SFH's.If the animal brings an undue financial hardship to the building owner.If the animal would cause damages or harm to others in the building."

That said, there is probably no harm in reiterating this policy here.I agree that specifying a NEMA rating for the EVSE if it is outside is probably a good idea. 

make it a part of your business policy so you can be consistent and not accused of unfair housing practices. it can be unpleasant with an unresponsive or difficult tenant but if the tenant is damaging your property or not abiding by the terms of the lease, ultimately they are harming you. 

I do not know the legality behind not being able to change locks if the property has not been occupied, but do not see the harm in trying to secure your property in the meantime.  

Yes, as usually happens, laws designed to "protect" people (eg discrimination) end up indirectly harming those they meant to protect. 

If you make it seem like you are helping someone, or if you try to help but harm them, or if you get their equity by buying it from them under market, you might be put into the crosshairs of a district attorney for portraying yourself as a foreclosure consultant.