There have been many threads recently debating the merit of this supposed rule.

Whether a law suit has merit or is frivolous, it will still cost you time and money. 3.

If I am reading this correctly this is the article under KS law that upholds its members, managers, agents, employees, etc, harmless of any law suits to the extent that they have adhered to the “merits” of service they claim in their operating agreement. http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/statute/017_000_0000_chapter/017_076_0000_article/017_076_0070_section/017_076_0070_k/Merit meaning: “the inherent rights and wrongs of a matter, as a lawsuit, unobscured by procedural details, technicalities, personal feelings, etc.: The case will be decided on its merits alone.”

Simple self interest (avoiding the cost of vacancy and eviction) dictates treating each case according to its own merits, and I have no illusions about being in it by myself.

I look at every deal on its merits.

Better question - what are your merits to recommend someone spend so much money on time after a first deal?

(not endorsing them but can cite their merits) It enables a Landlord to get a just & fair snapshot of the creditworthiness of a potential tenant.

Let her know that all service requests will be evaluated on their merit and have a place on the form to turn down the request.

The loan, now unsecured, stands alone on its merits for the lender to determine if legal or practical to attemp collection from other assets of the debtor. 

I list FSBO all the time because having been an agent at one point I do not think listing agents really bring that much value to merit paying 6-10k and just pay buyer agent.