He is getting too busy and the passion he has for CF and talking about "his" company got him banned for a couple weeks from BP...not the first time.I am general counsel and think it's important that all CF info about what is going on in the industry should be available to the Crowd.  

So we (North Americans) are sitting on the largest reserves in the World of an efficient, clean burning, and cost effective fuel source (Natural Gas) and the politicians response is to ban using it.Only in government folks.

I have about $20k in liquidable investments and have been looking for friends who want to jump on my ban wagon.

Since BP banned our founder for doing that.However, information is so valuable and important I have been given the task, to just keep writing.Hopefully you and @Bryan Hancock can understand that.  

I know HOA's have a lot of power on choosing what they enforce and let pass, as well as what rules they adopt, but it still makes me uneasy, as I could and up sitting on a house that I have to sell with high transaction costs if they adopt such a ban or cap.

Even if the government has a substantial interest in doing so (which is debatable) how is a complete ban narrowly tailored?

Please search here for "Assignment Contract" or "Should Wholesaling be banned " or " Is Wholesaling  Legal ".Please help yourself by trying to dig up some of the answers yourself.

Also,  If anyone could speak out about how the JOBS Act lifting the ban on advertising for securities can change how you raise funds. 

That's the kind of thinking that gets bandit signs banned.  

@Justin HerringtonWhile Thorold does not give a maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in a direct manner, it appears to define any building providing lodging to more than four (4) occupants as a boarding house:“boarding house” means a building in which lodging is provided for more than four (4) persons in return for remuneration or for the provision of services or for both and in which the lodging rooms do not have both bathrooms and kitchen facilities for the exclusive use of the individual occupant;In turn, they restrict a rooming house or lodging house (but never marry definitions to that of the boarding house) as follows:Where a dwelling unit contains rooms intended to be used in conjunction with a rooming house or lodging house, the occupants may share a single bathroom provided that: (1) not more than nine (9) persons occupy the dwelling unit; (2) for each additional nine (9) persons or part thereof, there shall be an additional toilet, handwash basin, bathtub or shower; and (3) access to the bathroom can be gained without passing through: (a) a habitable room of another dwelling unit; or (b) an open area, which is not normally heated during the period of the year which heat is required by article 2.22.3 of this by-law.So, it appears to come down to whether boarding houses are permitted where you property is located (and whether they need to be specifically licensed), unless your building would be seen as a non-conforming duplex.This is the question, I believe Thomas was asking.