From what I've read on here, I've interpreted that bird dogs have some control over when they work, am I incorrect?

There is regulation that some lawyers will interpret to mean that the laws are clear on the subject.

Use the info to interpret the values yourself.

Curious if you interpret it differently.

Not worth the hassle and once the buyer is spooked about a possible exploding water heater, it won't matter whether YOUR  interpretation of the code is correct or not

This means they’ll be getting rid of any regulations such as “parking lots will have adequate shading” which leaves a lot to the interpretation of whoever is behind the counter.

From what I read in books I have interpreted that it would be 30 year mortgages and reinvesting the income into other houses.

I actually refer to this fee as "Pet Rent" in my leases to remove any possible interpretation

My units did not have the level of disrepair your does so I think a judge might interpret you possibly grossly neglecting or mismanaging your property from afar and be more sympathetic to the tenant than usual.In my cases the tenants were inherited free loaders and talked about small wear and tear items the judge scoffed at or dime size stains on ceilings etc.No legal advice

Maybe I'm the only one interpreting this way, but it seems like the Kondaur guy is saying that on 12/9, whatever servicer that foreclosed on the property did so improperly, as it was no longer their note to foreclose on.If that's the case, it's not an REO, it's still Kondaur holding an NPN.Even if he is saying the FC took place properly and is valid, it looks like he's offering not to report the FC.