
26 September 2015 | 26 replies
Any thing you say to them about this issue may harm your case so do not discuss this with them any further but ask for the name of their lawyer and phone number to give to your lawyer.
7 May 2015 | 10 replies
Second hand smoke is ghastly and harmful to the health of others, so consider this if your property is multifamily or close in proximity to another.

10 May 2015 | 7 replies
If one is paying the rent, no harm, no foul.

29 April 2015 | 72 replies
With the knowledge and financial means to purchase an investment property, they are not an incompetent person; based on how courts normally examine the situation in which you present.The fact that the PM keeps the late fee also doesn't harm the LL, because the LL is still getting their same amount of rent as is guaranteed to them in the agreement.

29 September 2019 | 25 replies
Rather, out of a feeling of responsibility to my former tenants, who I happily provided positive references for.The reality is that it does a landlord no good, and could do harm, to respond to a reference request.I have also gotten calls from landlords lobbying for a statutory and regulatory change.

29 April 2015 | 28 replies
The police don't remove people claiming tenancy rights unless they are an immediate physical harm to themselves or other.

20 February 2017 | 66 replies
Nothing is offered to cause harm to anyone, but may be useful in your situation.

13 April 2016 | 34 replies
There would be no need to take this matter further legally and if so, could cause more undue harm than intended.

18 May 2018 | 51 replies
You ARE responsible for the harm your tenants cause neighbors.
2 May 2016 | 6 replies
Asbestos is only harmful in it's friable state, option #1 therfore to not touch if it's in good shape.