Perhaps it was one of the many anti-landlord laws that the city & state were looking to implement at the end of last year, but didn't?

Btw, I think I need to up my anti from Olive Garden to Red Lobster.

If you choose to foreclose judicially or non judicially, you may still be subject to single action (Anti Deficiency) so whatever you do, you'll most likely only get one shot (One action).I'm not sure there is any "legality of math" doctrine out there.

But I follow Paula Pant's anti-budget mentality.

But I feel it’s all in context, telling someone you’re an agent as part of your story won’t matter unless they’re just super anti-agent in which case you just have to work a little harder to win them over.

The general consensus from the Property Management community is that Bigger Pockets is anti Property Manager.

Since these ordinances are primarily anti-student housing or anti-boarding house family unit discrimination isn't really the issue.  

The city council is passing anti-STR bill after anti-STR bill.

I realize this is not statewide, but there are so many anti-landlord laws being experimented with lately.

I suspect the gov't regulators that designed the current disclosure forms had an anti-FHA bias, the pre-2015 disclosures didn't cause as much confusion, there's no other typical/standard fee that they make look like it's charged 3 times...