Because 10 years from now when the rules have changed, or they are interpreted or enforced differently you want a record that this condition was approved.

Initially, I did not know how to interpret that statement, and was conflicted in that Maverick was introduced to me via a third party as a ‘turnkey provider’.Now, I am a firm believer in the concept of transparency and full and fair disclosure.

Their rates are pretty high and the main drawback is it's not a revolving line (at least that's my interpretation.)

That is up to the person borrowing the money and interpreting the use of those funds.  

The tax code is sometimes subject to interpretation, which may explain the divergence of advice we are currently receiving on the subject of education.

Am I correct in interpreting the following as property taxes not being an issue after the sale?

Should have been a red flag right away.From the expenses perspective, due to poor management, I've had to try and interpret some things myself based on what was reported via their 2016 & 2017 taxes.Cleaning/maintenance: 2016 ($1855), 2017 ($1247)Utilities: 2016 ($6568), 2017 ($6060). 

Again, I am new at this so I may have interpreted incorrectly. 

But the $25 per month is where I disagree with the PM's interpretation of who should get that. 

While everyone strives to give the most accurate information it doesn't apply universally to all situations.Some parts of Federal and state statute laws are very clear and some are vague and not as defined on a hard line but open to interpretation.