With the BP member I am assisting, we are still looking for the right deal but we have come across a handful of deals with $100+ of cash flow per door.

As a rule, regardless of your political leanings, these are generally going to be red states.

During those 10 years, all positive cash flows and any funds from property sales will be re-invested in the business (e.g. re-invest in property, accelerate mortgage repayments, put in an escrow to raise interest etc.).

When a service member is given orders to move or deploy, the Landlord is required to let them out of the lease early.

I've gotten mailers advertising RE listings from neighbors who happen to be RE agents, that are full of glaring errors.

(Possibly the attorneys on the forums might care to provide their opinions on the above questions for clarification or further discussion)When the bank counters the offer, if it is opposed to assigning the contract, there will be a clause in the counter offer stating that the property cannot be re-assigned.

The social security program is a ponzi scheme and should not be relied on.

Seems like that might cost less money in the long run, considering the unit can be re-rented quickly?

I believe we should all consider our audiance as it continues to grow to put our best foot forward.I'm really looking forward to the new PM system, hopefully that will be a big plus for us to communicate.....which brings me to another point;I don't follow and make connections with others here, not because I'm being snobby or don't like anyone, but I can see that as an endorsement of sorts and I simply don't endorse others as I never know who will come up with what scheme, program or mess up with some other member. I

I would play it safe, this could be red flag not to rent to them