I never really take it serious with rent rate optimization.

I think the optimal strategy will be to find cities that have good returns, maybe not the highest, but that also have minimal regulatory risks.Nashville, Charleston & Asheville are great examples of cities that have some of the highest returns, but the regulatory risk is so high that it might not be your optimal city to invest. 

If you boil your question down to the basics, it is asking - "Would you be ok with buying a property that only gives you 1/2 of the revenue streams available to an optimal property that both cash-flows and appreciates?"

There are also a bunch of free tips and tricks for optimizing your listing that can help with search rankings. 

To further expand my real estate endeavors, I acquired another condo near the strip, implementing a house hacking strategy to optimize the use of space.

It does NOT mean that if you buy a Safeharbor 401k document that you're "safe" from severe IRS & DOL penalties if the plan is not operated compliantly.From a plan design perspective, "Safe Harbor 401k" is often NOT the optimal design and results in unnecessary costs to the business owner AND missed tax deductions.

The optimal plan of action is determined by your personal objectives, level of risk tolerance, and state of the market.Good luck!

.- number of units (in the case of MF)- location of real estateThe investor has to decide what mix is optimal for their situation.4.

As a specialized real estate CPA, I'm here to provide expert guidance on your most complex tax matters, from navigating 1031 exchanges and cost segregation studies to optimizing your rental property deductions and handling multi-entity structures.

This is one of a plethora of reasons that many ADU additions are not optimal RE investments.