hi LukeJermaine here, well I guess that is one way to look at it, I look at it as having a race horse and having it trot around the track, it's a race horse Luke make that thing run!

These are the kind of questions that, if you follow them cautiously wherever they lead, can make you a horse pile of money. 

So I won't beat a dead horse.

It was a massive cart-before-horse challenge to communicate the nuances of work I was currently doing at the time, work I was planning on doing myself, work I was planning to contract out, and work I would do if the requirements fell within my time and financial budget (despite bringing a clear typewritten scope of work and pictures). 

Not to beat a dead horse, but everything as it relates to complexity is based on the transaction itself.6.

When you google earthed it, there was poison ivy that engulfed the entire house and growing into the 2nd story window that had been busted out. all of this was about 3 years prior to the demolition. it would be interesting to have seen it before they started demolition.Needless to say, 2 houses were torn down. 1 saved. the new church now has some extra land on both sides. it cleaned up nice.The city really does their best with publications though, you can lead a horse to water but you cant always make it drink.

*****However, that's a bit of a horse and barn door issue.  

IMO, the landlord went into bankruptcy to stall the foreclosure, not to avoid dealing with the security deposit.

You can also stall and say you are evaluating other applicants.

These 50's & 60's built homes are the work horses in my portfolio.