I've witnessed investors make their decision on purchasing a property based on it being an area considered to be a rental neighborhood, or a owner occupant's neighborhood.I haven't quite yet grasped what difference does it have on an investor's profit if the home is either of the two options.More than happy to hear other's take on this topic, Thanks.

It does not need to be notarized, but that would be like a witness for both of you.

This sounds like the Soviet Union.I don't think you could be accused of discrimination.

The defendant and witnesses were all illegal aliens.

I have worked in soup kitchens, and have witnessed a kitchen running out of food with mouths left to feed.

A few days later, she formally accused me of discrimination with the government housing people.The upstairs lady was black and a single mother with three children.The downstairs lady (complaint filer) is white and a single mother with three children.For the record, I'm a white guy.Uhm, huh..?

I have been accused of over-improving rentals but I also keep my tenants a long time.Good luck!

My approach accuses, it probes for weakness, it is often unfair.

The accused have none of the rights of a criminal.

I am certified by the State of California to testify as an expert witness on matters of real estate valuations including cap rates.