If the buyer can afford both no harm done and most lenders will let greed get in the way of lending when they make a loan and never tell the borrower to not incur more debt.Joe Gore

You will have to take them to court to create any significant repercussions and they may well have too little assets to cause any serious harm to.I do have a "lease breaking clause" in my lease.

To me, it conjures up visions of trying to do it as fast as possible, which anyone who knows how involved things can get, would mean cutting corners, taking the easy way out on issues that pop up (and they always pop up) as well as those stupid TV shows that show people doing the renovation process at light speed and making boatloads of cash on it.Now, you will NOT find any links at the bottom here for some "go fund me" account for my "operating expenses" since I've set my budget at $0.00 nor will I be hounding anyone to hand out leaflets or "manage the North Carolina division" and thus committing lots of time, I'm not asking for any time or any money, I just am asking everyone to consider IMMEDIATELY ENDING all use of that term, I not only see absolutely zero benefit from it, I see lots of harm as I'm also the broker who sells these homes I renovate and have taken far too many calls where the buyer's agent who's looking to just set up a showing time, has one question for me "Is this a flip" and it is ALWAYS said with a sneer that says it all to me, that we're cutting our own throats with that word!

No harm culling zillow as well.

I could understand if there was a legitimate threat or harm being done to the public but I don't believe that is the case, Just as in my case, and many others, we lend to investors.

The reaction to the $710k was "no harm no foul" form the sellers point.  

There is no harm in having the contract signed by this heir to the property.

@Hunter Harms@Cara LonsdaleHunter, what's your background?

There is almost always a clause in the contract where you agree the PM isn't liable for stuff like this.You really weren't harmed either.

They go by the license laws of that state and whether the public at large is harmed by violations of a brokerage, agent, etc.Ethics is different from disclosure license laws which in many states say on all contracts and contact you need to disclose you are licensed.