I think you're dissecting my comments to make them false when they're meant much more general...

There is NO WAY a prospective tenant can sue me for discrimination, which will not happen in my apts as I put in my own tenants.In my apts Here in Brooklyn, I have the world of all kinds of minorities and status, each of them I know very well and will stand up for my Character in Court.The diversity in my buildings are incredible and represents just about everyone.Also, because I provide them with great service and speak with them on occasions, anyone coming to my building who claims discrimination will be proven to be false as I probably already have that protected class in my building.The only commonality is that all the tenants meet a Qualification criteria of Credit, Income and other non-discriminatory criteria.BUT, I know that's not LL.

While AirBNB is certainly imperfect about how they handle resolutions, I think there are some valuable insights here about the necessity of documentation.Putting myself in AirBNB's shoes, photos and invoices are absolutely critical to resolving disputes and damage/expense claims - otherwise, they would be at the mercy of people who wanted to abuse the system and make frivolous or false claims.  

This, in my opinion, is a false narrative and this industry is here to stay.

I'm saying it's irresponsible to post your gross without disclosing all the associated expenses because it gives viewers a false sense of success.

Send a postcard that has to be returned - that would also be easy to set up a false listing and a PO box.

It's a false figure.

If the patients do not meet the definition of needing the assistance, the provider is hesitant to falsely complete the form and provide it to a third party. 

She was given a lot of false information in order for the potential renter to give up a lot of her real information.

So the assertion that the "best case scenario" of "$1.5 mil/year (3% of $50mil)" is demonstrably false--because we've already proven it so.