I would need to know exact location in order to give a more conclusive opinion.

I've been running numbers this past week and my conclusion is I need to increase my income before I can qualify for a loan to house hack.

In conclusion, investing in real estate and the securities markets does not have to be an either/or decision.

Is it a foregone conclusion to happen?  

If you eliminate the word flipper from your vocabulary and do things that demonstrate your intent to hold the property like - documentation to your professionals, long term financing, putting rentors in, not advertising for sale immediately, holding longer rather than shorter time frames...all of these are not conclusive evidence (neither was a 12 year hold period) but they help.Why not use an alternative model to fix N flip.  

I started trying to track down what the OL # was that was assigned to me and my property, started a thread with the city of Austin, and eventually came to the conclusion that it does not exist.The City Of Austin is now likely aware of the fact that the property has been listed on Airbnb, VRBO, ect. for months without an Operating License.

Here is the mistake EVERYONE is making.The truth of the matter is that the conclusions you are drawing are simply put, illusions.Here is why.You cannot target motivated sellers.

I have looked up a lot of information regarding property gains taxes and house hacking since we would be in a similar situation and have not found anything conclusive to direct us.  

You magically attach this and it is an illusion what conclusions you pull based on that metric.Obviously the amount of money you made IS a direct measure how effective a marketing strategy is.So are we all in agreement?

Any post that starts with an introduction and conclusion is a ChatGPT post