I'm assuming (maybe falsely) the odds are good that many who actually apply will meet the lease requirements (aka tenant checks) so then it's a matter of which one.  

Also the difficult tenant may share false information about the property which could negatively affect the sale.

And yes we have frustration when some one sites statutes from a different state and thinks its the same everywhere, thats how rumors and false ideas get started, like when someone says you cant evict someone in winter, Bull, its legal, and done every day.  

She never abused the privilege and I would've put a quick stop to it if she had.To your second point: true, but I feel like I'm responding to the usual false dichotomy often presented in discussions of PM: to wit, EITHER:Pay 10% of gross revenues to have PM; OR:Personally make 3AM calls to deal with clogged toiletsI'm merely challenging this notion.

If it's starting to show signs of possible water damage, apply a false side.

Ignoring buried equity only creates false cash flow.

Know the law and don't let brokers spew false statements at you. § 42-26.

If the story seems legit or is false then it is your judgment call on what to do with the balance.

My rental application states that missing, false or unverifiable information is grounds for rejection.

Have you found that BBB reviews have been mostly reliable (ie, low number of false reviews, bots, etc)?