Depending on how strict they are, they could make you tear them down or at least bring them up to current code with inspections.You might want to go down to the Building Dept (or call) and ask (without giving an address) what they would recommend.

Just know your properties will get additional wear and tear most likely that you might not otherwise get from residential tenants.

It is a tear down opportunity.asking Price : 400ksqft: 2,954Built in: 1948Arv: 775k to 880k

The long-term rentals just generally speaking have less problems overall as it's less wear and tear on the units.

If the house is in a horse neighborhood, and has enough land with it for lunging and stabling It seems like it's the owners call if he wants to rent someone with a horse or not.People with a horse are going to pick a place like that if they can afford it, versus a single family home with a yard and a fence especially one of those chain link fences with the little barbs at the top which will tear the hide open on the horse meaning veterinarian expenses.

It's called a straw man logical fallacy because you bring up an argument that you litteraly have with yourself and then tear it down. 

This is a lot to learn in the fire, but sometimes the best education comes through blood, sweat, and tears!

Gorbachev "Tear that wall down!"

Not sure why it would be 100k, its just PVC, 10 or 20k will get you to the sidewalk, once you're tearing up the street add 25k.

The house is a tear-down.