Other than signing (acknowledging) the HUD-1 I have not signed anything!

No acknowledgement, no appointment.Thinking about kicking her out for this seems like a huge overreaction.

I understand how (and why) many investors would not want to acknowledge the evolution of the real estate investing market in the past ten years into more of an equity trading platform through 401k's and other new investment products...

(leases w/ tenants are in place).I know he has had some hefty repair bills in the past from looking at his cash flow statement; can I rightfully expect him to acknowledge those on the disclosure (even for things like "fixed running toilet")?

Very acknowledgeable helpful people.

Also, I do acknowledge there's value in meeting a prospective tenant face-to-face, but this seems to be such a time suck.Thanks in advance for any feedback you might have.

But understanding the implications of taking on mountains of debt, and acknowledging that plain simple fact that this is exactly what mortgages are (mountains of debt), needs to be a part of the plan.This flies in the face of traditional/prevailing BP wisdom about always being hedged to the max, and that's OK.

I attest that all construction, plumbing, or electrical work will be done, in whole or in part, by me or by subcontractors under my supervision, in accordance with all applicable laws; and, I further acknowledge that said new home is not covered under the New Home Warranty and Builders Registration Act (N.J.S.A. 46:3B-1 et seq.) and that such fact shall be disclosed to any person purchasing this property within ten years of the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

BTW, I fully acknowledge that whatever loan officer type person you’re talking to may not fully understand all the rules for removing PMI, even though we’d like to think they should.

It doesn’t sound unreasonable for the tenant to have a written acknowledgment from the landlord that payment was received.