I would rather wager that I own more properties to provide me with the potential appreciation and cash flow.

This is risky as they dont know if you're going to make a profit or lose money.I would wager the underwriter would use 2-5% of the loan on the property's balance as a monthly mortgage payment however its at underwriter discretion it depends on how the underwriter will treat this debt.

I think right now this is anyone's guess, but I'd wager that my $400,000 1500 sqft 1950s build duplex here in Denver doesn't need substantially more than it's counterpart in Ohio in the way of CapEx and Maintenance.

Please don't think I'm trying to be negative or troll-y, but if any developer has an algorithm for this, I would wager that developer would be reluctant to publish such proprietary information on the web so they can have more competition.The Knoxville market, and probably most/all of its sub-markets, have cooled substantially due to affordability and lots of other factors.

I would wager it quadruples.

Originally posted by @Brian Wagers:@Jamie Atkinson Doing great and hope the same for you.

She needs to read it, but giving my proximity to this pulse I am wagering she isn't overreacting.

The inverse becomes true as someone's net worth drops as your Risk of Ruin (RoR) flies up exponentially when you're dropping a lot of your bankroll on one wager). 

I'll wager you have come across these folks and seen this in play.  

For example, if someone built or retrofitted a building in either Bristol into trendy lofts or apartments, I'd wager they would be popular.