People see on the TV shows how easy it looks to jump into real estate.

This is why you really need to review the comp sales versus the subject property to make sure you are comparing apples to apples (or as close to).

Case in point a Guru Carleton Sheets who has now past away (MRIP) sold a  real estate investing course on late nite TV back in the 90's and early 2000s.

(But it wasn't apples to apples.)I looked at AirDNA's data recently and don't disagree with their broad picture but again, people here know that the details and other factors can tell a different story and bring success for some in the same area (comparables) and loss for others.I'm all about reducing risk and my read on climate data and global economies (& yes, politics) incline me toward continued investment in properties that have multiple channels of revenue, above a certain latitude, and more upscale.

Listen, despite what people see on TV, real estate investing is tough.

As an STR investor and agent in Phoenix, Arizona, I would utilize your local tax records and look at similar new builds in the area (even if they are in different subdivisions - as long as they are apples to apples).

Hi All,I want to get started buying notes and wanted to compare apple with apples.

She claims most of the time it’s her kids playing and watching tv especially know that they’re off for the summer.

However, he still has some items (TV, bags) in the garage.

Therefore the bad apples will bring values down as a whole.