The meaning, interpretation or extent of a certificate of title may vary with the geographical location of the property, but is generally defined as a statement of opinion prepared by a title company or an attorney concerning the status of a title to a parcel of real property based on an examination of specified public records.

It's difficult to find someone who will do this at an affordable price because the skills to review & interpret a PPM don't come cheap.

I’ve commonly heard that if you have to put a higher downpayment on a property for it to cash flow, them you’re looking at the wrong deal. how do you generally interpret that as you mentioned consider putting more down?  

However, they will generally interpret any ambiguity in favor of the tenant.

I know directly, you need to be owner occupied, or is there any workaround, leeway, or creative interpretation (for example, 1031 into an FHA with my mom, and my mom been owner occupied.) 

The problem I see:I'm trying to digest these new ADU laws enacted October 2019 and my interpretation of the language is such that because this property is under LARD 1.5 zoning and the lot is less than 6,000 sqft, I would only be legally permitted 3 units.

Any information that is left for interpretation will likely result in conflicts, so it's best to get the Scope of Work & Contract as detailed as possible to designate each parties' responsibilities.Generally speaking, I will provide all of the finish materials on the project (tile, cabinets, plumbing/light fixtures, etc.).  

The IRS called foul, and they and their tax attorney spent the next five years training IRS agents on how to properly interpret the tax code.They won EVERY ARGUMENT!

That being said, after disasters there have been instances where courts and/or government bodies have stepped in and interpreted policy language very broadly, potentially resulting in coverage being applied.We don’t know what is going to happen, but there is no doubt this is a disaster that was unplanned by anyone.

On its face it appears to be an impossible requirement to fulfill, so until there’s case law to go on it’s anyone’s guess/interpretation.