But you have to vet each one first to make sure the rehab would really be in budget and that the rental potential is there.When attacking a "1% list" like what I pull I see it as peeling layers of an onion.  1% is the easiest quick and dirty barometer for potential cash flow, and there are other quick and dirty ways to estimate all the numbers based on correlations to nearby rental listings from the same MLS. 

I’d stay out of Portland until the local government’s attack on landlord’s has had a chance to be an tacked in court.

I am away from home a lot of the time and Katie works full time.Hopefully that painted a bit of a backround, and now I can be more specific on where we are at.We are going over different plans of attack, and looking at options, like paying off our current home (which we plan to keep and stay in, but we are always open to options).

A lot of grasping at delusional straws occurred.MERS has long been attacked and has been found to be perfectly legal.....counties don’t like it because the whole purpose was to avoid paying mortgage assignment fees every time the mortgages were assigned/sold.

and Friend B has a heart attack with the lost revenue.  

Not attacking you but Google is not an attorney and getting advice from this website (which is very pro wholesaling) is not wise.

@Manuel Villegas If multi family cash flow buy and hold is your goal, sticking to B-C class areas would be a solid way to attack that.

I was having panic attacks when I made offers.

They certainly don't deserve to be attacked for pointing out that an unethical agent has been unethical.  

And it really wouldn't take much for a large and capable nation to destroy crypto via a 51% attack, which I think people are kind of blind to that possibility.