Sure, they did nothing wrong, but trying to invest in a neighborhood private road is pretty lame, akin to patent trolls.

Point being, it's patently not the case.  

FYI, patents on the lighting system, bond, and project architecture are in the works.

Originally posted by @Mark Elliott:jesse t. you are incorrect. refinancing a house is considered a sale. whatever you " sold" the house for becomes your base purchase price for calculating the " gain". therefore, if the house is worth $200,000, and you refinanced at $100,000, your gain would be $100,000. even if you purchased the house for $1, your gain would not be $199,000, but $100,000 because the proceeds from the refinance are not taxable. its done all the time in real estate This is patently untrue.  

The first has 75% ownership and the second has 25%.In a more complex case, one member would generate an ownership percentage based on contribution of labor, property, materials, patents or anything else.Your operating agreement should spell this out.If its the first case, the first member would sell one third of your ownership to the second member.

Depends on class of rental of course, but if you are renting C or D class, I am not sure you would want the tenant in the property by themselves.I think part of the reason there are limited options is that Rently and a couple other lock companies have patents on what they are doing. 

@Chris Clothier I have always and still respect you but what you wrote is patently false.

Some areas of Derwood and Silver Springs don’t have the best school ratings (but subjectively I hear from the patently the schools are great).Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Maybe you can be the first to patent the landlord workout !  

I had all kinds of notes of everything we had talked about, from his son who lived out here in Cali like myself, to his invention that he could not yet tell me about because he was waiting on the patent number.