Here’s a breakdown of the pros and cons of each approach based on my experience:Tenant Swapping:Pros:Tenant Retention: Keeps the property occupied, which helps avoid vacancy periods.Minimizes Turnover Costs: No need for cleaning, marketing, or re-screening tenants if the new person is already known.Flexibility for Tenants: Can be seen as a more tenant-friendly approach, allowing them to find a replacement without facing penalties.Cons:Risk of Unknown Tenants: The new tenant might not be as reliable as the original one, leading to potential issues down the line.Lease Violations or Delays: If the new tenant doesn’t meet the lease requirements or fails to sign a new agreement, this can lead to complications.Operational Complexity: Keeping track of the lease terms, managing paperwork, and ensuring proper screening for new tenants can increase administrative work.Notice for All (One Notice to Vacate for Everyone):Pros:Clear Expectations: Everyone knows what’s expected, and there are no surprises with last-minute tenant changes.Consistency: Easier to manage leases and tenant turnover with a straightforward system.Quality Control: You can screen all tenants that are moving in, ensuring the new occupant meets your standards.Cons:Longer Vacancy Periods: The property may stay vacant for longer, especially if finding a replacement tenant takes time.Tenant Frustration: Current tenants may not be happy with the requirement to vacate, even if they want to stay.Marketing and Re-screening Costs: You’ll have to go through the process of finding and screening new tenants, potentially leading to increased costs and downtime.I’d love to hear what others are doing!

A buyer has approached his realtor and explained that he (the buyer) would like to buy the property as an investment to rent but that he can only make money on renting it if he assumes my brother's mortgage.

My fiance and I are currently based in Australia and exploring our options to get involved in USA Real estate.Currently exploring some approaches and how we can get involved over in the USA.

If they've collapsed, they will need to be dug up and replaced.

.- Holding generates ongoing cash flow, equity growth, and tax advantages from depreciation.No right or wrong, each approach aligns with different goals, budgets, and risk tolerances.

Given that I have no debt and own a house worth 1.3 million, what are some approaches to leveraging my house with a HELOC to obtain cash flow to avoid employment?

Here's one way to approach tenant about increasing the rent:We’ve found a great way to raise rent is:Determine market rentShare the proof with the tenant (they can see it on Zillow anyways)Tell the tenant, given your rent is $x and market rent is $y, what do you think if a fair increase?

For those who have flipped or renovated tenant-occupied multi-family properties, what’s the best approach to getting tenants to vacate?

Could you share some avenues I can explore that align with this approach?

Now I’m looking to apply that same problem-solving approach to real estate and start building something for the future.Right now, I’m in learning mode and open to any advice, especially on getting started the right way.