Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 hours ago on .

User Stats

953
Posts
414
Votes
Melanie Thomas
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Antonio
414
Votes |
953
Posts

Tenant Swapping: Do You Allow It or Is It a "Notice for All" Policy?

Melanie Thomas
  • Real Estate Broker
  • San Antonio
Posted

Hi everyone,

I'm curious to hear from property managers who focus on single-family homes and similar rental properties.

When a tenant gives notice to vacate, do you allow them to swap tenants, or do you consider the notice to vacate as notice for all tenants in the lease?

Here’s a breakdown of the pros and cons of each approach based on my experience:

Tenant Swapping:

Pros:

  • Tenant Retention: Keeps the property occupied, which helps avoid vacancy periods.
  • Minimizes Turnover Costs: No need for cleaning, marketing, or re-screening tenants if the new person is already known.
  • Flexibility for Tenants: Can be seen as a more tenant-friendly approach, allowing them to find a replacement without facing penalties.

Cons:

  • Risk of Unknown Tenants: The new tenant might not be as reliable as the original one, leading to potential issues down the line.
  • Lease Violations or Delays: If the new tenant doesn’t meet the lease requirements or fails to sign a new agreement, this can lead to complications.
  • Operational Complexity: Keeping track of the lease terms, managing paperwork, and ensuring proper screening for new tenants can increase administrative work.

Notice for All (One Notice to Vacate for Everyone):

Pros:

  • Clear Expectations: Everyone knows what’s expected, and there are no surprises with last-minute tenant changes.
  • Consistency: Easier to manage leases and tenant turnover with a straightforward system.
  • Quality Control: You can screen all tenants that are moving in, ensuring the new occupant meets your standards.

Cons:

  • Longer Vacancy Periods: The property may stay vacant for longer, especially if finding a replacement tenant takes time.
  • Tenant Frustration: Current tenants may not be happy with the requirement to vacate, even if they want to stay.
  • Marketing and Re-screening Costs: You’ll have to go through the process of finding and screening new tenants, potentially leading to increased costs and downtime.

I’d love to hear what others are doing! Do you allow tenant swapping, or do you prefer the "one notice for all" policy? What’s been your experience with either approach?

Looking forward to your feedback!

business profile image
RentWerx Property Management
4.6 stars
2892 Reviews