data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/457d6/457d62614010437704c01112118e26da0333fa44" alt=""
7 October 2021 | 2 replies
It may be considered suspicious activity if you do this too often...I know I would ask questions.Cheers!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/714ed/714ed49dadd7b097328d21955feaf7feed589182" alt=""
13 October 2021 | 22 replies
May have been paranoid, but became suspicious and though they were going to try to "hustle me" together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5270a/5270a9cf2b14f6a45f8652a24c162ba61e166810" alt=""
4 November 2020 | 68 replies
@Jon Schwartz1) To begin with 3 million FMV in California captures innumerable small business owners standing entirely on its own, but if that weren't bad enough, the valuation standard is actually aggregated across all properties owned so it's not in fact in excess of 3 million per property making it much worse still.2) Commercial properties have a very suspiciously expansive scope in the initiative (the devil is in the details, as is typical, and here as well) thus capturing both mom and pop businesses and in many cases even agriculture.3) Unsurprisingly those proffering the provision have acknowledged it is but a first step, once they get their foot in the door with passage of the initiative they will shoot for full repeal of Prop 13 targeting all real estate owners.4) But you make a really great point, sell it as tax on fat cats (while in reality it's scope will hit many many small businesses) makes it palatable to a largely uninformed electorate and further softens them up for delivery of the really big hammer when they shoot for full repeal of Prop 13.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/734fe/734fe988023980ab467406462f1590026286eea8" alt=""
29 September 2020 | 4 replies
But I'm still suspicious that the rest of the drain lines under the foundation might be compromised too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05bcc/05bccf95e8a66ee57f0829f5d03da1906974763c" alt=""
3 October 2020 | 7 replies
You don't have to use it at all for personal if you don't want to and have all 'maintenance trips' but that might look suspicious and be audited.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8266/e826607ae44252b40f488b8ff8ef0fe40a0a58a1" alt=""
4 October 2020 | 52 replies
The DRUG LETTER:Dear 123 Main Street Tenants, There have been suspicious reports of drugs at this property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68eef/68eef15231a2b6827cfb15c2ca21e2123693eae6" alt=""
14 October 2020 | 3 replies
Just seems suspicious that they "forgot" to tell me about an account they opened for my LLC that I don't want.PS - I just received the $86 invoice for the mountain of checks they sent me and I'm extra annoyed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f9e4/6f9e4dbfe52e70817b304f5a4f5596d0018e6507" alt=""
14 October 2020 | 7 replies
@Chris CarreathersI’d be suspicious if she kept the tenants outside the house instead :)It’s a negotiable term to have the property delivered vacant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e5a2/9e5a267bd43098bc3e1ca58a3b4c6d736e4fcc7f" alt=""
20 October 2020 | 6 replies
While it seems suspicious, there could be a good reason for it.