I understand and can accept that investors have to pay for sweat equity but this seems unreasonable.

It looks like VRMA is also doing a lot to encourage homeowners and managers to unite against unreasonable short term rental regulation. 

I don't want to scare him off with an unreasonable expectation of fee payments. 

You chase down an investor online, secured funding, and opened a new rental arbitrage that stamps out money for you and your family.It's amazing what can be done when someone decides to be unreasonable and not accept the status quo.I'm so proud of how you've kicked down doors and created money out of thin air!

I'm sure it won't be cheap, but even if it's $10k, that'll pay for itself in 5 years.I'd also be interested in splitting the water too, if it was really cheap to do so, but I'm assuming that at a savings of only $600 a year, it'll take an unreasonably long time to pay for itself.

I just paid the collection, in retrospect it wasn't worth stiffing someone who ripped me off, but as someone who sees a lot of credit reports, that seems unreasonably harsh. 

I tell them that I have "unreasonable expectations, it needs to cashflow well" so they don't keep sending me crap.

I know the whole idea is for it to be turnkey, but since I'm local, I didn't know if this would be an unreasonable request.

My thought is that with any multi-year double-digit year over year increases (with rents up ~50-100% in the Bay Area over 7 years), it's not that unreasonable to give back the last couple years of increases, at the end of a cycle.

It seems the buyer started having second thoughts and became unreasonable with inspection repairs.