Is this unreasonable?

Since you are really and truly just putting a slight twist on how you flip to work around the permit issue, do you really think they are being unreasonable against you as opposed to other flippers who don't do a work around?

The investor gets 100% of cash flow from the rented side and pays 50% of expenses.Essentially this is double leverage and in-house management for the investor in exchange for credit approval and equity share for my friends.Does this seem unreasonable?

Even the most unreasonable lawsuits.

Not completely unreasonable for someone whose time is justifiably valuable.He's probably as skeptical of you as you are of him.

Many thanks for sharing your experience @Brandon Hall I didn't know the unreasonably unfair rules in DC.  

RCW 59.18.150 (6) Washington State Residential Landlord-Tenant Act, provides as follows: “The tenant shall not unreasonably withhold consent to the landlord (or manager) to enter the dwelling unit at a specified time where the landlord has given ... notice...”

If you read the notice, most times it will have contact info on it, problem is, most times your going to find the financial institution very unreasonable to work with.They usually want full price on a property that isnt worth anywhere near it, most times it will drag on this way for several years before being auctioned off for a fraction of the price.

As for the daily unreasonable requests, just say no.

. (~1.13%)Taxes: 4kInsurance: (Haven't sourced yet, nothing unreasonable).I know the area well and already own a property nearby, it's a good area, suburb of a university town, almost no crime, and rents easily.