General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/219f1/219f109ef5f0260560636ade4c0b914f2a5ac2b3" alt="Jack Krusinski's profile image"
"Irrational Tenant" Clause in your lease?
In Ohio, does anyone know if you can have a "Irrational Tenant" Clause in your lease? Most reccenlty, we have been dealing with a irrational teant. The tenant is being very rude, unprofessional and demanding. For example, they have come out in the yard yelling at our lawncare provider. Left us many emails, texts and voicemails demanding unreasonble request on a daily basis.
1. Do I have a right to evict this tenant?
2. In the future, can I include a clause in my lease which stating something along the lines of "the teants must act rationally and professionally?
- Jack Krusinski
- [email protected]
- 216-789-6736
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9e5a/d9e5adc0be7fc25ba25a48156d4731081bda3c01" alt="Greg M.'s profile image"
- Rental Property Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- 4,935
- Votes |
- 2,092
- Posts
You're going to have a hard time evicting someone for rudeness. If they start harassing or threatening the lawncare provider, that might be an evitable offense.
There is an easier solution that I have used. Tell the lawncare provider they are free to tell the tenant to "go f*** themselves".
As for the daily unreasonable requests, just say no. Sorry, can't do that. Won't fix that. Not replacing that. No, no, no.