@Michael Clatterbaugh Personally, I prefer multifamily for the scalability.

I would suggest not to do it in person as that is not scalable or a great use of timeLead paint depends on the individual situation. 

After doing active single-family for years, flips, vacation rentals, buy and holds, house hacking...I burned myself out with the time commitment, stress, and the lack of team and scalability.

I really started researching hard/private money for the scalability aspect of it, that’s what really gets me interested.

I'd be fine giving up some equity for faster growth and scalability but I'd love to hear your thoughts for not giving any equity while still keeping investors engaged with all your projects.Thanks!

It's totally scalable if you want it to be. 

They can spiral out of control quickly.Create scalable systems.

As far as scalability goes though, which do you think wins, cash flow or appreciation?

That is not very scalable and very costly.

I also don’t think I’d be a bad agent at all, and the entrepreneurial aspect (scalability, no boss, high commission, hard work=better pay) all appeals to me.