I'm doing a deal right now with another wholesaler that I am "trusting" as he is kind of guiding me through the motions.

We do have 2 loc's with $70k max cap right now.We also plan on forming a company before this all sets in motion, i'm not sure if that matters or if you have any advice regarding this?

this is not true for all neighborhoods-inspectors can drive you nuts and there is no uniformity at all in the process here in okc metro.  

I am prepared to discuss my  broker and the marketing plan but that has already been put into motion so nothing new there to discuss really.  

@Christopher Throop There doesn't seem to be any uniformity so taxes can vary widely.

Without getting too far in to murky details, what I am saying is I belive most RMLO's in the market helping with SF in any form are probably pretty uniformed about the ramifications of their actions and Sellers are trying to use them as circumvention to the rules, which most often does not work in the eyes of the law. 

If the Seller's attorney is inept and screwed up any of the very specific, tedious, administrative details required during the 45-day barment period, it's a better than good chance the judge hearing the case won't grant the motion that would pave the path to an insurable title.  

I sometimes just tell my prospective tenants, "The motion sensor lights, bars, etc. are probably not necessary.

After going through all the motions with a local bank, we were offered a max of $75k, which came as a bit of a surprise considering the property is worth $350k with no debt.

An early reply said buyer can make late payments with NO effect on the contract.Buyer has made every payment so far, though some have been late.Kentucky law states the uniform landlord-tenant rules do not apply to our situation.