This is pissing on the grave of every dead cop who has died, protecting and keeping safe every self righteous ungrateful whiner in this thread.He then tries to tell us that cops who worry about dying in the line of duty and worry about the welfare of their wives and kids at home while they are out facing death are "paranoid and insecure".I've never seen a more blatant example of out-right cop hating here before and Jason you should take a long look in the mirror and contemplate how many cops have died protecting the society you enjoy.

The employers are crying because they can no longer suck money out of the American economy to justify their own outdated business model.What is even more disgusting is the way these blatant lawbreakers (the employers) are willing to let their names be published etc.

I remember seeing blatant drug dealing in a pretty central location four years ago along with lots of smells of 420.  

The person might not get caught one time and claim ignorance but if they do it over and over they are showing a blatant pattern of DECEPTION.In that case they just can't say ( Your honor I didn't know I couldn't do that).

For frequent flyers going through the body image scanners a lot, the risk is too much radiation and cancer.Captain Dave Bates voiced the union’s concerns in a letter published by The Atlantic late last week.Bates asks that members be aware “that there are ‘backscatter’ AIT devices now being deployed that produce ionizing radiation, which could be harmful to your health.â€The move follows the detention and suspension of an American pilot who refused to be scanned.Captain Bates suggests that pilots refrain from being put through the scanners and if necessary opt for a pat down by TSA officials instead.“We already experience significantly higher radiation exposure than most other occupations, and there is mounting evidence of higher-than-average cancer rates as a consequence.†Bates’ letter states.Earlier in the year, scientists warned that the machines constitute a potential health risk, noting that the radiation given off by the devices has been dangerously underestimated and could lead to an increased risk of skin cancer.Despite these fears, the blatant violation of privacy laws, and the consistent lies that the authorities have engaged in over capabilities of the machines, Janet Napolitano, head of the DHS, recently announced plans to expand the full-body scanner program even further.In the U.S., travelers can refuse the body scanner and opt for the pat down, however, this option is not offered by the TSA, rather the traveler must declare that they wish to “opt outâ€.A recent New York Times report describes the humiliating turn of events should airline passengers exercise this right, with individuals being singled out and prodded, probed and poked by TSA agents in front of everyone else queuing in the security lines.New pat down procedures have recently been instituted by the TSA, allowing agents to use their fingers and the palms of their hands to feel around breasts and genitalia.

Not knowing who your HVAC person or firm is up here, I'd be very curious as to IF the city of Milwaukee DNS (Dept of Neighborhood Services-where all of the inspectors, city planners, etc work) or even the state of WI in any capacity has any other suggestions OR if there's any outside chance that when someone mentions "yeah, we're going to replace the current central heating system (which I'd sure as heck assume must be gas or MIGHT be still heating oil if it was never retrofitted or replaced since way back when) with electric baseboard heat" if they're going to suddenly have steam pouring out of their ears or some other cartoon character type reaction, because as I'm sure everyone knows, it gets damn cold up here every winter (especially compared to Cape Coral where it is warm enough to have all of those canals all over) Not only is electric heat WAY more expensive than gas heat now, IF the new EPA regs that are blatantly designed to make life hell and skyrocket bills for states heavily reliant on coal for generating electricity (like here in WI!)

Either by misrepresentation, unrealistic promises (hence unrealistic expectations) or blatant violation of the law.In my experience, bird dogs come and go.

Sounds like blatant marketing, Kristine.  

After viewing the property I noticed that there were quite a few items that would be identified in an inspection but are blatantly not repaired in addition to significant cracks in the brick suggesting foundation movement.  

If myself or a realtor were to blatantly suggest you buy in a certain neighborhood because we perceive it to be good that could very well be considered steering, even if it were a harmless suggestion with no discriminatory intent.Please feel to reach out to me for any assistance.