Given that it was Sunday the part was not available.On Monday, the commercial tenant claims to have experienced a loss of revenue because the space was too cold to receive (scheduled) clients.The tenant offset the rent by the amount of revenue alleged to have been lost that Monday. 

That being said, you can find unintelligent client complaints alleging all manner of ridiculously atrocious improprieties about any number of Fortune 500 companies.

In this case, the tenant's invited guest allegedly created a disturbance that led to the police being called to the residence which led to the blood damaging the property. 

@William Johnson Er, do you have a "partner" as you alleged, or was that just customary wholesaling-spiel?

If you don't see discoloration or evidence of mold in the attic area along with in the exposed areas of the bedroom, I would not be as concerned about the allegations of mold affecting the tenant health.

YES, I regularly get CR, BG, Public Records (meaning judgments filed, not allegations).

Once you do, it can be alleged that you Had the code and DID enter.

You can have all of the benefits of Trevor's viewpoint without assuming all of the risk.An LLC is litigation protection from suits not covered by insurance (any alleged intentional fraud, gross negligence, health code violation, etc.)You want an LLC to hold the assets separate from yourself or the operations of the company.

And I totally get that price is an issue, but what about you save $100 but we exclude any allegation of lead paint poisoning, is that worth $100?  

A thorough response as always.I have my own take, and as any attorney will say, this is not legal advice...For the asset protection purposes you need both (1) insurance and (2) properly structured company for litigation protection, an LLC/LP/etc.Insurance protects your from nuisance that occur on the property; i.e. slip and fallThe company structure protects your assets from litigation liability; i.e. gross negligence (health and safety, alleged known hazards, fraud in the sale of the property) as well as someone getting to your assets by suing you personally (e.x. you got into a car wreck that exceeded the coverage of your policy, now they can go after your assets)The due on sale clause is often a concern, but me and my colleagues view it as a very low risk for a number of reasons.