Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
4
Votes
Chris H.
  • Lakewood, CA
4
Votes |
11
Posts

First time buyer (owner occupied) after investment purchase

Chris H.
  • Lakewood, CA
Posted

Hello BP community,

I'm looking for some help. I currently rent and do not own property. I'm looking to purchase an investment property first because buying a house for my family right now, financially isn't in the cards and I want to begin my REI path. So my question is this, how will buying a (non owner occupied) rental property first, impact buying a primary residence later (hopefully in a few years) with a low percentage down or first time buyer type loan ? I'm concerned about not being unable to take advantage of something like that because I technically won't be a first time buyer.

HELP ?

Chris H.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,067
Posts
933
Votes
Scott Smith
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
933
Votes |
1,067
Posts
Scott Smith
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
Replied

@Thomas Franklin thank you for clearly defining the issues. A thorough response as always.

I have my own take, and as any attorney will say, this is not legal advice...

For the asset protection purposes you need both (1) insurance and (2) properly structured company for litigation protection, an LLC/LP/etc.

Insurance protects your from nuisance that occur on the property; i.e. slip and fall

The company structure protects your assets from litigation liability; i.e. gross negligence (health and safety, alleged known hazards, fraud in the sale of the property) as well as someone getting to your assets by suing you personally (e.x. you got into a car wreck that exceeded the coverage of your policy, now they can go after your assets)

The due on sale clause is often a concern, but me and my colleagues view it as a very low risk for a number of reasons. This risk can also be further minimized by placing the property in trusts which appear to be for estate planning purposes but in actuality are in order to move them underneath the protection of your LLC. If you want to know more about this, please PM me.

IF YOU LIKED THIS POST PLEASE VOTE

Loading replies...