18 May 2019 | 2 replies
The IRS rulers prohibit any direct or indirect benefits to you.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/224301/small_1694636004-avatar-ilandlord.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 September 2018 | 14 replies
What would the indirect costs be (your time, stress, headaches)?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/685470/small_1621495431-avatar-calebg9.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 January 2017 | 8 replies
Budget for all of the direct and indirect expenses.Be comfortable hiring others to supplement what you do.
5 November 2014 | 3 replies
I was thinking about doing ads on craigslist but since I am a math teacher I prefer the law of averages presented in direct mail.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/127846/small_1621418168-avatar-wte0001.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 May 2015 | 7 replies
So he/she would not be wanting to put me in direct contact with the seller.3.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/293018/small_1621442198-avatar-bdi.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 September 2016 | 4 replies
There can be no direct or indirect benefit to your husband or a business he controls.There is a program referred to as a Rollover as Business Startup that does allow you to take existing tax-deferred retirement funds and use that to capitalize a business that you are directly involved in.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/3823/small_1621346780-avatar-jeff88.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 February 2009 | 16 replies
Jason,Thanks for the tips, that makes a lot of sense.I wouldn't completely discount sales copy though, especially in direct/internet marketing.I guess I'll try out different things to see what pulls the best response.Jason,You're in a prime position to make a lot of money if you have lots of rent to own buyers lined up.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/140074/small_1695268555-avatar-tim407.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
2 May 2013 | 9 replies
The 50% rule "of thumb" doesn't directly have to do with cash flow it has to do with expenses(which indirectly do affect cash flow).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/393793/small_1621448763-avatar-jwilson9.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 February 2018 | 3 replies
@Jordan WilsonQuite possibly, yes.So long as the transaction does not create any direct or indirect connection with a disqualified party, exchanging a property for another property instead of cash would not produce any IRS compliance issues for the IRA - in and of itself.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/570212/small_1621492820-avatar-mn_cpa_investor.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 April 2018 | 14 replies
It seems more like an indirect way of raising municipal revenue and removing the 'interested landlords.'