I still be wrapping up a couple of reno projects in the near future and usually I default to voucher tenants.

For starters one thing negative in my market which is Baltimore and DC is voucher recipients doht want these homes because the voucher allows them to get better even if you fix it up. 

The vast majority of our investors like Richmond County because they can purchase a 4 bedroom property in a decent rental neighborhood for $35,000- $45,000 and rent it for $750.00 ( This is the value of an Housing Authority 4 bedroom voucher in Richmond County and is typically used as the baseline for setting rental amounts).

The tenant is aware of the inspection and most often will make sure they do not risk losing their voucher.

I believe that in order for the tenant's voucher to be in jeopardy he has to have a drug charge.  

My one complaint would be with Section 8 tenants (and we sometimes have them)  asking me to take yet another $100-$300 off so their voucher can cover a newly renovated place.  

At some point there will need to be more vouchers and such in place so that the workers at the bottom will be able to live in these places to support the economy.

That includes income source--so you can't turn down a voucher holder just because you don't want to deal with the bureaucracy.

Hi folksI have made a mistake of allowing a voucher-assisted tenant to move in when she did not have the full amount of security deposit during Lease signing.

Use their vouchers.