Maybe my voting poll was too small but the consensus was that perception is everything.

With the Reagan/Thatcher years perceptions changed and profit was no longer a dirty word.

This hurts the site owner (discouraging people from coming back if they've left for a while for whatever reason) and hurts the users (people start to look less valuable just because they haven't been around, which is an inaccurate perception).

This event will likely change the inaccurate perception of RE investors and will be the first of many steps to irradiate the crooked gurus from our industry (Ok, that is fairly optimistic, but at least a great start!)

Once we get beyond our egos, does media perception really damage our bottom line?

As a real estate agent, tile gives a higher perception of value, whereas an insert gives a lower perception of value. 

@Matt Devincenzomy perception is the reality of the situation as far as I'm concerned.

I will say that some sellers are motivated but their perception gets skewed when they get a price from a realtor.

With that being said, I'm torn between originality and perception vs cost!

When I first started at 22 I did not realize how your communication affected people's perception on everything.