But that has not often been the case in my work.

I cannot find a case in either Oklahoma or Texas where the court has pierced an LLC because the LLC had only one member (if anyone knows of one, please post or send it to me).  

My experience there has been terrible - what AWB/REI tells investors at RWN presentations (and on its own website) has not been the case in my reality.

I believe that may have been the case in a prior iteration of the exclusion... back in the mid 90s.

It's typically easier to push values higher on large homes because it only costs $50-$100 to remodel a house, but resale values range from $250-$500/SF (of course this is the case in my area, I'm sure your area is slightly different)3.

Why in turn the door was opened for a tenant to make a case in response.

They would see if that was the case in their computer.  

This seems to be the case in your situation; the structures may follow all density limits, setbacks, height restrictions, parking requirements, lot coverage ratios, etc. of the single-family zoning code, but the use of the structures may be governed further by the ordinances of the municipality, disallowing absentee owners from renting out each structure under a separate lease. 

This leads me to believe that the standard disclosure for transactions in the state of Ohio was missing, and that we may have more of a case….in any case I’ll be following up to get legal advice on that 

What you are asserting is not necessarily the case in all situations.