“Nothing down” is a possible and legitimate way of structuring a real estate transaction, IF, there’s full disclosure to all parties involved and structure of the transaction is not merely a way to try to work around the problem of mortgage fraud.  

We practice "safe real estate", so this is all possible but not necessarily what will occur.This is not exhaustive and does not constitute any fiduciary responsibility, it is merely one man's opinion on a public forum.

If the purchase price is greater than your remaining entitlement, you merely have to do a 25% downpayment on the remaining amount.

I do not produce or sell plan docs; I merely send clients to whomever I think best.  

In most cases these are not issues that can be easily resolved and typically the damage can merely be mitigated.

If you tell me the majority of the partners are merely writing checks and are passive LP's that's different but that's not what this sounds like. 

Tenant has to merely state they do not have the means for pay for the appeal and they are granted appeal.

Let me make you realize this is not mere opinion. this is FACT!

I much prefer to be able to "force" appreciation rather than merely put myself in a position to "ride" appreciation. 

I'm not demeaning your position, I'm merely seeking an avenue in creating a fixed cost scenario while also having total control on how my tenants are handled.