Hey @Ashley Turner, here is the status - https://ohiohouse.gov/legislation/134/hb563Like @Dave Stokley said, it is held up and looks like it is going back to the drawing board.

. - regulations - NYS, where I invest, just passed some insane piece of legislation, where it makes me think twice about continuing to purchase mobile home parks.As far as profitability for a mobile home park, you have to run the numbers on every deal.

Urban areas are more prone to imposing restrictive legislation on STRs than tourism-driven areas (where both my VRs are).Finally, when considering what size of house to get, if you move forward - the numbers usually look pretty on the bigger houses, but consider the additional costs involved too: you have to furnish all those bedrooms, pay utilities on the larger house, incur more damages from larger groups, have a higher risk of unauthorized parties, etc.  

Legislators have learned that NIMBYs are some of the biggest culprits of smashing affordable housing projects and legislation built to facilitate density and adorable housing projects (See SB 50 that can't seem to pass).

There are legitimate concerns about their impacts on housing markets and neighborhoods, and those concerns are starting to be addressed through legislation that could really impact investors who find that the rules have changed after they buy.I would also caution about getting too deeply invested in Wilmington.

In our market, would you say that the long-term trend is moving towards lot size being more valuable in the city of Seattle with the new legislation to increase density? 

Further googling has shown me that the issue is that IRS rules and legislation isn't clear on some of the issues related to STRs. 

Which is exactly why it will never see the light of day when it comes to legislation. 

Its not legislative, its regulatory. 

This was the big fuss when that Washington Post article came out about 8 months ago or so.Did legislation in DC ever get changed or is it still in limbo?