For one, trying to set uniform prices violates anti-trust laws.Two, every deal is 100% unique - some deals have a $5K profit margin for the wholesaler, and the next time there's a $50K margin.

These types of laws are also called "anti-deficiency legislation."

For me personally I am not as anti Guru as many who post here..

Almost of those younger inhabitants are white and quite a few of them have anti-immigrant views.

What I will admit is a little troubling to me are the numbers of respondents here whose answers border on "yea, it's illegal, anti-thetical to the concept of equal opportunity, inconsistent with the promise of the United States Constitution, but meh, no big deal".

so it seems there is an inherent anti-landlord bias in their research based on the group actually surveyed.  

As our savings grow (still less than 100k, but definitely more money than either of us have ever seen in our lives), I've been thinking about using the cash to put 20% down on well-priced homes in other states that meet the 1% rule, renting them out, and then having local property managers keep up with the day-to-day maintenance.Still need to do a lot of research--I know the FIRE community is very anti-outsourcing for property management, and I know it cuts into profits, so I'm curious about the BP community.

This may be a good case to track as it may provide the necessary precedent for lawsuits throughout the nation.L.A. sued by landlord group over coronavirus anti-eviction protectionsI am not a lawyer and I'm not interpreting this lawsuit as being justified in any professional manner.

@Greg R.I understand the sentiment its a common theme on BP and  Dorkin was when he started this site very anti guru. 

Clicking on the link led me to lots of anti white articles.