data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85e5c/85e5cc5eed49be089c06ccaa25185f6ed15bd207" alt=""
15 September 2020 | 17 replies
But yes, if the roof leaked and destroyed belongings it's not unreasonable for you to replace the belongings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4233/c423325f9faa6edc413279bfb13127b770c4ef5d" alt=""
16 May 2019 | 3 replies
Is that an unreasonable expectation, especially for 5 college kids sharing a house?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88891/88891dd8e04902083df100567bea3c44f169086b" alt=""
12 January 2020 | 9 replies
A little history on the transaction - a Triplex with asking price of $235k, I offered $215k and the seller has countered with $225k. They have been trying to sell since May 2019 and initial price started at $295k. T...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11127/11127c09cb8b5e02844c70994060a6819de8ba83" alt=""
13 May 2020 | 9 replies
He said this was due to the climate.Based on my figures of (NOI/CAP) - the building is worth 425-450K so I didn't think getting 320 was too unreasonable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efdbf/efdbf2b09b6809a13bcfa6444409d3c52c75e2ce" alt=""
1 February 2021 | 12 replies
Regarding this new partnership If I am understanding you correctly your opinion is that even though the GC is not investing capital it is not unreasonable that he/she be entitled to a 50/50 split?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6759/e6759600f3ec39be731cb397fbb9dbcca413c15b" alt=""
19 January 2021 | 10 replies
If his buy out is unreasonable, splitting or selling is a better option.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05ce2/05ce213eb3e35d3dc547c98663083f2f6de29751" alt=""
15 January 2021 | 1 reply
@Alex Carreras That doesn't sound unreasonable especially if they are doing any kind of patio work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22d7c/22d7c213eb1f6d4e77301e4fb36c7bd001777926" alt=""
26 April 2021 | 23 replies
That is the problem number one is an unreasonable inspection request.You are within your right to request whatever you want, but on the day the inspection contingency is set to expire, you are requesting full replacement cost.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6396/a639676b0640c178e569c4ac43c6a875db3078d6" alt=""
27 April 2021 | 7 replies
The tenant's attorney waited 5 business days to contact me, and sent me unreasonable requests that I could not agree to, so the tenant is backing out of the lease.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41845/41845d29231aa086876b2eeacf779758fc4a3905" alt=""
5 May 2021 | 12 replies
If it's usually 2-3 weeks, then it'd be unreasonable for them to charge more than 2 months' rent while looking for a new tenant.I'm not surprised you haven't found a replacement yet.