Since yesterday a company called Nvidia is valued higher than Apple. 

Developers have already started renovating old buildings and turning them into luxurious apartments.Be careful of where you decide to invest though because some bad apples have been coming to the area and causing trouble. 

RE exposure will be there, just not this large allocation that BP thinks. yea and they are not stupid either because they know each local RE has more dependencies to supply-demand dynamics rather than interest rate alone.this is why even for hedge fund, they only purchase in certain area in bay area only like in cupertino or sunnyvale where it's good school district and next to Apple.

The cap rate can help you to do an apples-to-apples comparison in your market.

This is why you really need to review the comp sales versus the subject property to make sure you are comparing apples to apples (or as close to).

(But it wasn't apples to apples.)I looked at AirDNA's data recently and don't disagree with their broad picture but again, people here know that the details and other factors can tell a different story and bring success for some in the same area (comparables) and loss for others.I'm all about reducing risk and my read on climate data and global economies (& yes, politics) incline me toward continued investment in properties that have multiple channels of revenue, above a certain latitude, and more upscale.

As an STR investor and agent in Phoenix, Arizona, I would utilize your local tax records and look at similar new builds in the area (even if they are in different subdivisions - as long as they are apples to apples).

Hi All,I want to get started buying notes and wanted to compare apple with apples.

Therefore the bad apples will bring values down as a whole.

Being able to see their pricing and occupancy along with the product they are selling is more "apples to apples" and gives me an idea of what I have to do to compete.