I doubt the defects you show on the flooring would surpass that standard.

Evidently, that work wasn't adequate, and the new homeowner should probably be going after the roofer for construction defects.

Guys this is an excellent tool to negotiate a deals, this is a legal documents and once it is disclose the seller is liable because he has knowledge of the defect.

You also may have a situation where the seller has an opportunity to cure the defects revealed in the inspection. 

(I understand that without listing out the specific structural defects in greater detail what I am asking is hard but just trying to get a general idea.)Thanks

That's fine for the company if that's how it want's to do business but bad for the insured who winds up with a claim because of a defect in title that wasn't caught because of a truncated search and exam.Then, with the introduction of computers, companies decided to buy the data from the counties and dump it into proprietary databases. 

Federal Court Affirms No General Duty For Title Insurers To Search For And Disclose Title Defects Unless Preparing Abstract Of Title - Insurance Laws and Products - United States (mondaq.com)

I look at it as relatively cheap insurance and protection against the unknown or unpredictable.Just because title came back clear, can you be 100% certain there isn’t (or won’t be) some unknown/future title defect/claim, or pending lawsuit that hasn’t even resulted in a judgment yet?

For private areas of the home like bedrooms, I often refinish the wood floors myself even though in very old houses the floors might be poorer quality and have defects.

(The HOA was fine but the HOA was suing the builder over picayune "defects").These are disclosure items.