
28 March 2016 | 7 replies
If we have 2 good comps but no more, then we'll examine the contingent & pending properties.

30 March 2016 | 2 replies
I am new to the real estate industry and currently pursuing my licensure as a REA..state exam in a few days!
31 March 2016 | 2 replies
News and scandal in both directions from the same publication and even author is far more prevalent than is noticed till you start examining the copy regularly.
18 January 2016 | 1 reply
It's probably worth meeting with a flat fee based CPA - not just for this property this year, but to examine this issue on your past three years.

26 April 2016 | 26 replies
Here in Rochester, NY, they do not have an online service to examine these types of things.

21 January 2016 | 8 replies
At the moment, I just started the first half of the courses for the real estate exam in Illinois.

22 January 2016 | 3 replies
Well, funny you should ask. 5 years as a project manager for Lennar residential construction, all phases from land development to complete CO, 2 years as auto cad drawer for an architect firm in Florida, 4years as a plan's examiner for the city and 5 years working for the city as a construction inspector, and a degree in construction management.

20 January 2016 | 1 reply
I'm taking preforeclosure leads from an online publication's public notice, checking them on the local CAD to make sure they're not under water and one I ran into says under the "last transaction" section:"Sales disqualified as a result of examination of the deed:Transfer to or from bankruptcy trustees, administrators, executors, guardians, personal representatives, or receivers" which I'm not sure what that means, but usually it's accompanied by like a $100 price tag, or something really low as if just to have a number in there but this one in particular has a $207,800 one from back in 2011.

23 July 2019 | 36 replies
The CFPB has claimed authority for the enforcement of SCRA and has pushed the OCC to do the same with depository institutions which they have stated they are now doing with every examination visit “because of the significant risk (editor’s note: fines and penalties) associated with an institution’s failure to comply.”

5 April 2016 | 19 replies
One definite 'no-no' in everywhere I've examined is having anything to do with the guest's or owner's money.