
26 April 2007 | 2 replies
If you are the note holder and are forclosing on the deliquincy then you have to deal with tenents rights in CA and need to get the help of the court to vacate the property after you have gone through the forclosure process.

7 January 2008 | 19 replies
I would suggest offering such a small offer that the lien holder would need a magnifying glass to read it.

4 May 2007 | 2 replies
With all due respect, if you have been financing for 14 years you would realize that you have just advised someone to commit FRAUD.The silent second needs to be subordinated and transparent to the 1st lien holder or it's FRAUD.

13 May 2007 | 2 replies
Do not use residential for commerical or visa versa.

19 May 2007 | 4 replies
My orginal thought was to have the LLC not only manage the property, but also be the title holder of the properties.

26 October 2009 | 24 replies
That being said, how likely would it be to locate such deals in declining markets such as mine (Las Vegas) in which the only apparent opportunities to profit at enough of a discount are dominated by short sales and REOs, as the majority of owners motivated to sell are those who are severely underwater (75% of every mortgage holder in Vegas).

24 May 2007 | 11 replies
With 5 lien holders and 2 of them have legal right over the first mortgage this one would be a nightmare to do even if he agreed to the sale.

24 May 2007 | 4 replies
credit card where you expect to receive a high credit limit, like capital one visa.
21 June 2007 | 4 replies
I'm fuzzy on this part, but I think if (say) the second mortgage holder redeems for the sale price, then next guy would have to redeem for the sales price plus the amount owed the second mortgage holder.

17 June 2007 | 50 replies
I believe our children will be very glad that we bought this property when they inherit it.Some of the people here telling you this is a horrible (not "marginal") deal are buy-and-holders as well.It sounds like you will buy this property.