This is a good strategy, then you can simply distribute the assets over that 10 year period as real estate properties. 

This is simply known as an On-site Rental Company.

Even when you exclude the ones who are simply renting out their own spaces - second homes, pre-existing ADUs, spare bedrooms, or their RVs, the number of people that started with less than we have is likely still significant.

…They simply have to buy as much or more than they sell for (after closing costs) and reinvest all “cash” they receive. 

Investors, (two of us) ultimately funded about 32% of the project with cash and additional money was raised from members of the local REIA, simply by word of mouth.

Simply, a percentage of the profits; so only AFTER the investors get their investment back + a “preferred” return of usually 6-8% annually.Here is how our equity (as opposed to our debt/loan/notes) syndications are set upwe as syndicators get a either a 3% broker fee or 3% acquisition fee at purchasewe get a management fee competitive with outside managementwe get 10% of gross rents as ASSET management feeonce investment is liquidated we receive 15% of proceeds ABOVE or AFTER investors receive their capital returned plus 10% annual calculated income including any distributions of earnings. 

The deal was quickly concluded and with check in hand we were headed to greener pastures, literally.

Both studies concluded that virtually everywhere it is cheaper to rent than buy. 

I was thinking that the cleaning fee could simply be covered by whatever the host is currently charging their guests, and the maintenance fee could be a set monthly amount to cover basic needs such as pool cleaning/maintenance, lawn care, pool deck cleaning, and minor touchups.What do you all think about this?

Many investors simply will not invest in property having negative cash flow.